<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Man is Meant to Act and Not be Acted Upon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog</link>
	<description>by Colin Jensen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What was it like to be President Barack Obama [ http://www.quora.com/Barack-Obama ]&#8216;s classmate?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/what-was-it-like-to-be-president-barack-obama-httpwww-quora-combarack-obama-s-classmate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/what-was-it-like-to-be-president-barack-obama-httpwww-quora-combarack-obama-s-classmate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/what-was-it-like-to-be-president-barack-obama-httpwww-quora-combarack-obama-s-classmate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quora connects you to everything you want to know about. _________This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/Barack-Obama/What-was-it-like-to-be-President-Barack-Obamas-classmate/answer/Colin-Jensen). If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quora connects you to everything you want to know about.</p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/Barack-Obama/What-was-it-like-to-be-President-Barack-Obamas-classmate/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/what-was-it-like-to-be-president-barack-obama-httpwww-quora-combarack-obama-s-classmate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who was the last mainstream Mormon polygamist prophet?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/who-was-the-last-mainstream-mormon-polygamist-prophet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/who-was-the-last-mainstream-mormon-polygamist-prophet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/who-was-the-last-mainstream-mormon-polygamist-prophet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heber J. Grant had three wives, married the first in 1877, and the other two in 1884.  The church ended polygamy in 1890 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/189&#8230;), but didn&#8217;t annul existing marriages or ask people to abandon their families, so Grant lived with his wives all their lives&#8211;but in those days that meant two died in 1893 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Heber J. Grant </b>had three wives, married the first in 1877, and the other two in 1884.  The church ended polygamy in 1890 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1890_Manifesto" target="_blank" class="external_link">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/189&#8230;</a>), but didn&#8217;t annul existing marriages or ask people to abandon their families, so Grant lived with his wives all their lives&#8211;but in those days that meant two died in 1893 and 1908, and the third died after him, in 1952.  <b>So the last mainstream Mormon polygamist prophet ceased being a polygamist as it were in 1908.</b><br />See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latter_Day_Saint_practitioners_of_plural_marriage#Presidents_of_the_Church" target="_blank" class="external_link">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis&#8230;</a>
<p>So the church was founded in 1830, so basically 2/3 of its existence there hasn&#8217;t been any polygamy, and even when it was on it was never a very high percentage of church members.  I read once that there was never a time in history where the majority of polygamists in the US were Mormon, and if you count mistresses and abandoned wives nationally into the equation, it was never 1% of national polygamy.  Net effect: most Mormons today have never met a polygamist and don&#8217;t know any more than you do about it.  (They&#8217;re more likely to have read a piece of historical fiction on the topic, but less likely to have seen Big Love and far less likely to have had an affair&#8211;so it&#8217;s up to you how to do the math&#8230; <img src='http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )<br /> <br />Now that I&#8217;ve said all that people will jump in and say there was unofficial polygamy going on for a while after 1890, since when rescinding a doctrine of a church everyone will go through the psychological process of thinking &#8220;if it&#8217;s divine, it&#8217;s eternal, so this change must have been show to get the haters off our backs, and God wants us to keep doing it in secret.&#8221;  That&#8217;s all very reasonable and valid, and as I said went on for a short period.  But by 1904 the church began excommunicating members who had anything to do with in these ceremonies, and it was never church policy anyway (and it definitely doesn&#8217;t fall within your question of &#8220;who was the last mainstream Mormon polygamist prophet.&#8221;)<span /></p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/The-Church-of-Jesus-Christ-of-Latter-day-Saints-the-Mormons/Who-was-the-last-mainstream-Mormon-polygamist-prophet/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/17/who-was-the-last-mainstream-mormon-polygamist-prophet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you pay someone to help you design your signature?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/16/can-you-pay-someone-to-help-you-design-your-signature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/16/can-you-pay-someone-to-help-you-design-your-signature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/16/can-you-pay-someone-to-help-you-design-your-signature/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes.  And I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s common.  We of course all design our signatures both unconsciously and consciously over the years, and that&#8217;s why handwriting analysis is valid when done right&#8211;because our signature is a caricature of how we want to present ourselves to the world, so of course there are statistical correlations to be had.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  And I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s common.  We of course all design our signatures both unconsciously and consciously over the years, and that&#8217;s why handwriting analysis is valid when done right&#8211;because our signature is a caricature of how we want to present ourselves to the world, so of course there are statistical correlations to be had.  I&#8217;ve absolutely always planned on hiring a handwriting analyst who knows Illustrator to help me redesign my signature one day&#8211;just to enhance the things I naturally do that connote virtues to those who are paying attention and remove the negative things.  And not just for PR, I also always have the superstition that it would help <i>me </i>self-actualize.  After all, marketing to ourselves is the most important and most overlooked marketing. 
<p>So I&#8217;d bet you could find someone with a legit expertise, even a masters degree, in handwriting analysis; who is naturally very artsy; who would be willing to spend the time to get to know you; who knows Illustrator; for comparatively not much money per hour. But it&#8217;s a process, no matter how you go about it.<span /></p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/Can-you-pay-someone-to-help-you-design-your-signature/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/16/can-you-pay-someone-to-help-you-design-your-signature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has something ever become widely accepted that was actually a mistake or typo in a publication?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/15/has-something-ever-become-widely-accepted-that-was-actually-a-mistake-or-typo-in-a-publication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/15/has-something-ever-become-widely-accepted-that-was-actually-a-mistake-or-typo-in-a-publication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/15/has-something-ever-become-widely-accepted-that-was-actually-a-mistake-or-typo-in-a-publication/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are frequently errors in books, from words being misspelt or an outright error in facts. Has this ever happened and the mistake became accepted commonly as correct? This is not about when a common held idea was later disproved, but when at the time of printing it was clearly inaccurate. This is also not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are frequently errors in books, from words being misspelt or an outright error in facts. Has this ever happened and the mistake became accepted commonly as correct?
<p>This is not about when a common held idea was later disproved, but when at the time of printing it was clearly inaccurate. This is also not about sensationalist journalism about celebrities either, otherwise we&#8217;d have hundreds of examples.</p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/Mistakes/Has-something-ever-become-widely-accepted-that-was-actually-a-mistake-or-typo-in-a-publication/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/15/has-something-ever-become-widely-accepted-that-was-actually-a-mistake-or-typo-in-a-publication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &quot;none are&quot; (vs &quot;none is&quot;) now accepted standard usage and should I just get over it?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/14/is-none-are-vs-none-is-now-accepted-standard-usage-and-should-i-just-get-over-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/14/is-none-are-vs-none-is-now-accepted-standard-usage-and-should-i-just-get-over-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/14/is-none-are-vs-none-is-now-accepted-standard-usage-and-should-i-just-get-over-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve gotten a lot of mileage over the years from the mantra: No one will notice but your boss. No one but your boss notices whether you shined your shoes.  No one but your boss notices whether you have you elbows on the table.  No one but your boss notices whether your wedding invitations have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotten a lot of mileage over the years from the mantra:
<p />
<blockquote><b><i>No one will notice but your boss.</i></b></p></blockquote>
<p>No one but your boss notices whether you shined your shoes.  No one but your boss notices whether you have you elbows on the table.  No one but your boss notices whether your wedding invitations have engraved or raised lettering.  But believe me, your boss will notice these things&#8230;
<p>Similarly, &#8220;none are&#8221; is not correct except in advanced exceptions like the ones given in other answers here.  It&#8217;s not just a usage thing&#8211;it cannot ever become correct because it is algebraically incorrect.  But it will be increasingly accepted by those whose parents didn&#8217;t correct their grammar, and that&#8217;s a self-perpetuating spiral from there&#8230;  (Whether that spiral is downward or upward is up to you.)  Go re-read <span class="qlink_container">Rich Dad Poor Dad</span> in that light (it attempts to be a book of correlations to rich people so we can all do a Talented Mr. Ripley.  Is rolling toilet paper over the top &#8220;correct&#8221; or is it just what anyone with an opinion and anyone in a &#8220;higher&#8221; social standing than you does?)<span /></p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/Grammar/Is-none-are-vs-none-is-now-accepted-standard-usage-and-should-I-just-get-over-it/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/14/is-none-are-vs-none-is-now-accepted-standard-usage-and-should-i-just-get-over-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the future for a print shop in the digital era?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/08/what-is-the-future-for-a-print-shop-in-the-digital-era/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/08/what-is-the-future-for-a-print-shop-in-the-digital-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/08/what-is-the-future-for-a-print-shop-in-the-digital-era/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As one who just spent a few years preparing our family print shop to be sold, and one who still writes for the Larry Hunt Newsletters, I love this question. A print shop is in no way obsolete.  We use them far far more than ever.  The primary reason print shops are in an identity crisis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one who just spent a few years preparing our family print shop to be sold, and one who still writes for the Larry Hunt Newsletters, I love this question.
<p>A print shop is in no way obsolete.  We use them far far more than ever.  The primary reason print shops are in an identity crisis is that the industry was largely &#8220;born&#8221; in the 60s  70s, when copiers and offset presses became small enough and cheap enough to build a business model around.  That&#8217;s worked great for 40 years, but over time the average owner simply grew older, and no one could have predicted when they got-in quite how high-tech and dynamic the industry would be.  Most owners were mechanics who thought a press would harness their talents, and 20 years into owning it they were expected to be passionate about PCL vs. PS, CMYK vs. RGB, and microlenticular vs. holographic printing.  Copiers have replaced presses, and home laser printers have replaced copiers.  As we&#8217;ve witnessed, there&#8217;s simply such thing as b/w 8.5&#215;11 offset printing anymore, and there&#8217;s no market for shop-level 4-color-offset.  Print shops are cheap for purchase now because, having been created in a boom, a large number of the owners are hitting retirement age at the same time.  Add to that that a lot of those owners, as they became more hands-off over the years, have neglected much of their technological mandate.</p>
<p>So, what is the future for a print shop?  Simple, your business model will revolve around the SKILLS and PROCESSES that can never be replaced by home printers.  As with all businesses, this is a question of defining your core competencies and understanding what your customers&#8217; true barriers are to &#8220;competing&#8221; with you by &#8220;doing it themselves.&#8221;  Any time you even consider competing solely on price or buying them off you&#8217;ve missed that boat.  There are plenty of high margin products that aren&#8217;t going away.</p>
<p>SKILLS</p>
<ul>
<li>Tech &#8211; You have a specialty.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if they&#8217;re programmers who work for NASA, they still don&#8217;t know the pros and cons of various printer drivers, they still don&#8217;t know the pros and cons of dye sublimation processes vs. latex printing, and they still don&#8217;t know the changelog of every version of PDF.  Know what you know and know what they don&#8217;t know.  You should be selling bar codes, QR codes, ISBNs, etc. simply because that&#8217;s where the demand is.  Web design, email newsletters, people even asked us to create email stationery for them (to match their printed collateral.)  Every time you say No you&#8217;re leaving money on the table.</li>
<li>Marketing &#8211; People don&#8217;t want to come to you just for printing.  They want to come to you for marketing.  The medium is irrelevant to what you do.  It is increasingly difficult to find a graphic designer to hire who hasn&#8217;t taken a ton of web design classes (and probably photography and 3D animation classes), so make your customers and employees happy by putting all that on the menu.  25% of your customers will come in expecting to spend $1000 on physical collateral, and yet will present you an @aol or @hotmail address for their business cards.  Just hook them up with their own domain (which they will renew every year through you for the rest of their lives.)  Then hook them up with a web site (which they will gladly pay retail for because you are more professional and thus take more risk away from them than most web designers.)</li>
<li>Design, pt. II &#8211; No matter how much you fear it, your customers aren&#8217;t going to be able to fake design.  You need to build your branding around the fact that your employees are designers, both born that way and certified by a major university in such.  In this economy we didn&#8217;t necessarily need to hire anyone to work at the copy counter who didn&#8217;t have a degree in art.  When you hear about an &#8220;<span class="qlink_container">Education Bubble</span>,&#8221; part of where that&#8217;s very visible is that currently, in a lot of surveys and industries, people with associates degrees in Art actually average higher wages than people with a BA in Art, who average more than an MFA who average more than a PhD.  Thankfully that hasn&#8217;t hit many industries yet, but it does mean that you don&#8217;t have to lower your standards when it comes to hiring for a print shop&#8211;you will have MFAs applying for your front desk jobs, so have more self-esteem than to call them &#8220;overqualified.&#8221;</li>
<li>Copywriting / Etiquette / Diction, etc. &#8211; As much as a home printer will not make your customers graphic artists, Microsoft Word will also not teach them to write &#8220;good English well.&#8221;  Before this print shop I owned a wedding invitations business in a college town, and almost every bride would ask me why they shouldn&#8217;t go online and pay half as much for the same thing.  What I didn&#8217;t tell them was that what they were looking at online literally came from the same factory as what I was ordering for them!  So why not?  These were college kids, some English majors, why couldn&#8217;t they just order them cheaper than my wholesale?  After a year of struggling with this question, it dawned on me: I had never seen someone pull it off!  No matter their qualifications, I had never seen one of those people actually produce something that I couldn&#8217;t tell was &#8220;fake&#8221; from 10 feet away.  No matter their degree in art, they couldn&#8217;t fake the tone.  No matter their degree in writing, they didn&#8217;t know the difference in &#8220;shall&#8221; and &#8220;will,&#8221; in &#8220;honor&#8221; and &#8220;honour,&#8221; in &#8220;the honor of your presence&#8221; and &#8220;the pleasure of your company.&#8221;  And if I noticed, their grandma would notice.  In the rawest sense, if they didn&#8217;t come to me the average price of their wedding present would be half what it would be if they did, so saving that $100 would absolutely and invariably cost them $10,000!  That realization defined a lot of the tone of my printing history &#8211; &#8220;no one will notice but your boss&#8221; became one of my internal mantras, as I saw case after case where someone with a degree in art tried to design their own ad, or web designer after web designer turned in art in RGB that simply couldn&#8217;t print accurately, or ad agencies tried to send their work to a warehouse somewhere because they couldn&#8217;t comprehend the variables involved.  It always failed if it didn&#8217;t touch my office, so sales was never a problem.</li>
</ul>
<p>PROCESSES
<ul>
<li>Wide format &#8211; Signs and banners will never go away, because home users will never buy 50&#8243; wide printers or stock 50&#8243; wide rolls of various types of papers.  Wide format can mean blueprints, vinyl banners, tyvek home wraps, hot air balloons&#8211;anything that is big and printed comes off a wide format printer, and there&#8217;s no reason you don&#8217;t have one.</li>
<li>Thick papers, strange papers, envelopes &#8211; Home users will never have access to, let alone be willing to stock, a wide variety of papers.  Plus no home printer can handle thick or heavily textured papers.  We bought a Xante Digital Press and largely paid it off over Christmas, just from printing the addresses on the front of people&#8217;s fancy Christmas cards.  In other words, people order Christmas cards from a fancy card company.  They want the names on the front to match the color and font on the inside, without the fuser melting the glue and thus sealing their envelopes which they paid $5 apiece for, and I knew there was no way &#8211; zero &#8211; to do that outside of my shop.  Ditto for wedding invitations or corporate party invitations.  Oh, and strange papers &#8211; if you want to print on something that has a loose weave or a texture, especially in a short run, in Northern California you had to come to me (and perhaps still can only go to my little shop.)</li>
<li>Tight registration &#8211; <br />Laser printers don&#8217;t have a tight enough registration for business cards, and one day that&#8217;ll go away, but there&#8217;s nothing on the horizon yet.  All laser printers, all digital processes, all inkjets, are only accurate within maybe 1/4 inch.  So they&#8217;re not accurate enough to print a stack of something and cut.  Which means <i>professional </i>business cards, for the foreseeable future, will remain on offset printers.</li>
<li>Spot colors.  Everything that comes off a laser printer is made up of dots of various colors, reconstructed through equations.  Nothing digital can match the exact color or lack of dots of buying a can of ink and pouring it into a press.  That&#8217;s the second reason serious business cards aren&#8217;t leaving offset in the foreseeable future.</li>
<li>Thermography/Engraving &#8211; More and more, wedding invitations will be done without engraving.  But etiquette moves slowly, and you&#8217;ve got 50 years before the high end of class will move away from engraving.  (They&#8217;ll move to thermography first.)  On that note, everyone loves (not me, but most people) love thermographic business cards.</li>
<li>Variable Data &#8211; As I said with printing addresses on envelopes, the world is moving toward variable data.  More and more of my customers brought me spreadsheets, or strange database dumps off their cash registers, and wanted me to scrub the data, extract the addresses, and build strikingly personal junk mail (and even email.)  I once got a magazine that had 26 covers, one for each recipient&#8217;s last name, but more than that a college pennant hanging in the background of the picture to match my college, posters on the wall to match my music preferences, a closet full of clothing matching my sports&#8211;all in glorious color on the cover of a magazine!  That&#8217;s not going away.</li>
</ul>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll stop there.  Comments?<span /></p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/Business-Development/What-is-the-future-for-a-print-shop-in-the-digital-era/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/08/what-is-the-future-for-a-print-shop-in-the-digital-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why has there not been a mainstream band with as much overall cultural influence as The Beatles, since The Beatles?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/01/why-has-there-not-been-a-mainstream-band-with-as-much-overall-cultural-influence-as-the-beatles-since-the-beatles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/01/why-has-there-not-been-a-mainstream-band-with-as-much-overall-cultural-influence-as-the-beatles-since-the-beatles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/01/why-has-there-not-been-a-mainstream-band-with-as-much-overall-cultural-influence-as-the-beatles-since-the-beatles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This discussion of course must and has come down to defining &#8220;influence.&#8221;  However, as to raw listens in 2012 (not just sales), last.fm reports the following on all answers given regarding the number of plays (or scrobbles) on/to their site alone: 1) The Beatles, 370M plays2) Michael Jackson, 100M plays3) Elvis Presley, 42M plays4) Stevie Wonder, 22M plays5) The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion of course must and has come down to defining &#8220;influence.&#8221;  However, as to raw listens in 2012 (not just sales), <a href="http://last.fm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="external_link">last.fm</a> reports the following on all answers given regarding the number of plays (or scrobbles) on/to their site alone:
<p><b>1) The Beatles, </b><b><u>370M</u></b><b> plays</b><br />2) Michael Jackson, 100M plays<br />3) Elvis Presley, 42M plays<br />4) Stevie Wonder, 22M plays<br />5) The Grateful Dead, 18M plays<br />6) Kraftwerk, 15M plays</p>
<p>I dunno, but to me the Plan A definition of influence has to be long-term listens (and sales if you can&#8217;t get that.)  Yes, it has to include a definition of &#8220;long-term&#8221;, maybe with the current listen-rate being divided by a factor of how old the bands are, etc.  </p>
<p>It just seems too easy to start from Leonard Cohen or Edith Head or Mozart&#8217;s mother instead of actual musical legacy, because they all defined what we listen to more than the Beatles in the abstract.  But those arguments don&#8217;t adequately address why people don&#8217;t listen to the Dave Clark 5.<span /></p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/The-Beatles/Why-has-there-not-been-a-mainstream-band-with-as-much-overall-cultural-influence-as-The-Beatles-since-The-Beatles/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/05/01/why-has-there-not-been-a-mainstream-band-with-as-much-overall-cultural-influence-as-the-beatles-since-the-beatles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If we all have $1 million, who is wealthy?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/30/if-we-all-have-1-million-who-is-wealthy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/30/if-we-all-have-1-million-who-is-wealthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/30/if-we-all-have-1-million-who-is-wealthy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#8217;t wealth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth) a relative thing? If we all have $1 million, who&#8217;s wealthy? No one &#8212; we are all the same. If however, you have $1 million and everyone else has $1,000, who&#8217;s wealthy? You are. By the same principle, if everyone reduces their wealth by the same amount to relieve the suffering of others, who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t wealth (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth" target="_blank" class="external_link">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth</a>) a relative thing?
<p>If we all have $1 million, who&#8217;s wealthy? No one &#8212; we are all the same. If however, you have $1 million and everyone else has $1,000, who&#8217;s wealthy? You are. </p>
<p>By the same principle, if everyone reduces their wealth by the same amount to relieve the suffering of others, who is becoming less wealthy?</p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/If-we-all-have-1-million-who-is-wealthy/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/30/if-we-all-have-1-million-who-is-wealthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Tesla wise to sue Top Gear for libel and malicious falsehood?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/13/is-tesla-wise-to-sue-top-gear-for-libel-and-malicious-falsehood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/13/is-tesla-wise-to-sue-top-gear-for-libel-and-malicious-falsehood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/13/is-tesla-wise-to-sue-top-gear-for-libel-and-malicious-falsehood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is why American Top Gear can&#8217;t be neutral&#8211;they are by definition owned by advertisers and libel for lawsuits if they were to ever give an honest review.  Next time public television gets its funds cut, I hope everyone remembers this example&#8211;Top Gear BBC simply couldn&#8217;t exist if it weren&#8217;t free to talk crap about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why American Top Gear can&#8217;t be neutral&#8211;they are by definition owned by advertisers and libel for lawsuits if they were to ever give an honest review.  Next time public television gets its funds cut, I hope everyone remembers this example&#8211;Top Gear BBC simply couldn&#8217;t exist if it weren&#8217;t free to talk crap about sacred cows.
<p>Okay, that being said, car people love Top Gear and love Tesla.  But one suing the other is a stupid PR move, because while it keeps the strange repentance on the news it&#8217;s also asking the audience to make a vote Tesla probably won&#8217;t win, even in their own echo chamber of Silicon Valley.  Demanding that the government censor a review show&#8217;s <i>reruns</i> because they gave a negative review of an environmental product?  How&#8217;s that gonna&#8217; go down with Tesla&#8217;s target market?  Would we be more sympathetic if Kelly Clarkson sued to stop Blockbuster from renting From Justin to Kelly just because she is now, like Tesla, &#8220;a serious contender with several high-profile investments and partnerships&#8221;?</p>
<p>They&#8217;d be better off getting a working Tesla without problems onto every international version of Top Gear, including the US one.<span /></p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/Is-Tesla-wise-to-sue-Top-Gear-for-libel-and-malicious-falsehood/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/13/is-tesla-wise-to-sue-top-gear-for-libel-and-malicious-falsehood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a low capital business that I could start in less than a month?</title>
		<link>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/03/what-is-a-low-capital-business-that-i-could-start-in-less-than-a-month/</link>
		<comments>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/03/what-is-a-low-capital-business-that-i-could-start-in-less-than-a-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 05:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/03/what-is-a-low-capital-business-that-i-could-start-in-less-than-a-month/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any service-based business.  For a while I &#8220;started&#8221; &#8220;a business&#8221; &#8220;a week.&#8221;  (See businessaweek.com.)  Once you accept all the quotes in that sentence, realize it was a neat experience.  It basically required exactly what you&#8217;re asking&#8211;I built a customer-facing front-end to one of my skillsets.  Because they naturally needed to be &#8220;low capital businesses I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Any service-based business</b>.  For a while I &#8220;started&#8221; &#8220;a business&#8221; &#8220;a week.&#8221;  (See <a href="http://businessaweek.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="external_link">businessaweek.com</a>.)  Once you accept all the quotes in that sentence, realize it was a neat experience.  It basically required exactly what you&#8217;re asking&#8211;I built a customer-facing front-end to one of my skillsets.  Because they naturally needed to be &#8220;low capital businesses I could start in less than a month,&#8221; most of them had to be online, most of them had to be service-oriented, and most of them had to be very dynamic (wikis, wordpress, etc.)  And I&#8217;m proud to say, almost all of them were in the black because of it.  (Basically any one that&#8217;s still up, 3 years later, is in the black&#8230;)
<p>So what could you hold yourself forth as an expert at?  What services could you provide?  Then put up a wordpress facade in a few hours, and the rest is marketing&#8230;</p>
<p>PS  Look at that site, and if you want to partner on any of those companies, say the word!</p>
<p>Answer #2: there are a million ideas I haven&#8217;t done yet.  I&#8217;ve recommended to a lot of people that they start <b>a google sketchup business</b>, if that interests you.  Just tell businesses you&#8217;ll build them a 3D building on google earth, tell them how quickly google maps is going 3D, and tell them how few 3D buildings are on there.  The glory of this is that the software is free and the skillset is basic&#8211;since because it&#8217;s web-based, sacrificing positively every complex aspect of the design in the name of size is the real art.  People would gladly pay $500 for you to come out with an iPad and use your augmented reality app to trace their building, and shazam!<span /></p>
<p>_________<br /><i>This post was in answer to a reader-submitted question at (http://www.quora.com/What-is-a-low-capital-business-that-I-could-start-in-less-than-a-month/answer/Colin-Jensen).  If you have comments, or if there is a topic you would like Colin to address, please comment below!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.colinjensen.com/blog/2012/04/03/what-is-a-low-capital-business-that-i-could-start-in-less-than-a-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

